Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1954No. Civ. 16000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This is an action on an oral agreement to leave property to plaintiff in consideration of services to be rendered and in quantum meruit, instituted against the executor of the estate of one of the promisors. The court by order of May 20, 1953, sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. Notice of appeal from said order was filed on July 10, 1953. On October 15, 1953, a judgment for defendant was entered on the demurrer sustained.

Since no appeal lies from an order sustaining demurrer (Taliaferro v. Wampler, 118 Cal.App.2d 391 [257 P.2d 674]), we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Baumann v. KusianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Aweeka v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API