Gene Hancock Construction Co. v. Kempton & Snedigar Dairy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
A summary judgment in favor of the appellees, defendants below, as to (1) appellant Hancock Construction Company’s right to enforce an alleged oral contract for the sale of realty, and (2) appellant Thuerauf’s right to enforce an alleged oral authorization to sell said realty, is the subject of this appeal. The pertinent provisions of A.R.S. § 44-101 are:
"No action shall be brought in any court in the following cases unless the promise or agreement upon which the action is brought, or some memorandum thereof, is in writing and signed by the party to be charged, or by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Cress v. SwitzerArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Stewart v. DamronArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Gabitzsch v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Arnold & Associates, Inc. v. Misys Healthcare SystemsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Johnson v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Schwedes v. RomainMontana Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.