Legal Opinion

Cnty. of Sonoma v. Gustely

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 31, 2019No. A153423PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKline, P.J.

*706Respondent Mark Gustely failed to comply with an administrative order finding various violations of county codes on his property and ordering him to abate the violations and pay abatement costs and civil penalties. When the County of Sonoma (County) filed an action in the superior court to enforce the codes, enjoin further violations and recover penalties, costs and attorney fees, respondent did not file a responsive pleading and the court entered a default judgment in favor of the County. The judgment, however, ordered penalties significantly lower than the amount ordered by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Sierra Club v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Gore v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. California Real Estate Loans, Inc. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Humboldt v. App. Div.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API