Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Riddell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 13, 2008No. 08-217PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Michael and Lindsey Spurlock filed a motion for rule on clerk seeking an order of this court directing the Arkansas Supreme Court Clerk to accept their record for filing. Appellants tendered the record on February 14, 2008, under an extension of time granted by the circuit court on December 7, 2007. The clerk refused to file the record because the extension order did not comply with Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 5(b)(1). Appellants subsequently filed the present motion.

Rule 5(b)(1) applies to both civil and criminal cases for the determination of the timeliness of a record on appeal. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Hairgrove v. OdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Kinder v. Wendy KinderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  2. African American Historic Preservation Committee, Inc. v. State of Texas and City of Texas City, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  3. BYRER v. ColvardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Ex Parte Oscar Minjare Sanchez, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Spurlock v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API