Pantoja v. Sprott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHILLER, J.:
Appellant, Jose Pantoja, appeals from the judgment entered December 29, 1997, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS:
Appellant sued Appellee, Lois Sprott, when he suffered injuries arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on July 6,1993. On May 11,1995, Appellant filed his complaint as an arbitration matter. 1 He later filed a petition to transfer the case to major jury status, which was granted by the trial court on November 28, 1995. After review of the Appellant’s case, however, the trial court, pursuant to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- McGonigle v. CurrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hall v. ReebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Tauss v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hayes v. Donohue Designer Kitchen, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Nygard v. Cafe Zesty Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
- Robert Half International Inc. v. Marlton Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Robert Half International Inc. v. Marlton Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006