Legal Opinion

Hixson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 15, 1999No. 13-97-288-CR, 13-97-349-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

Opinion on Remand by

Chief Justice SEERDEN.

Todd A. Hixson appeals from both the denial of his pretrial application for -writ of habeas corpus and from his later conviction for felony driving while intoxicated. By three points of error, Hixson complains that the trial court was required to dismiss his indictment as untimely filed. We originally affirmed the conviction. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this case for our reconsideration in light of their recent decision in Ex parte Jack Dobbs, 978 S.W.2d 959 (Tex.Crim.App., 1998).

The facts of this case are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Armadillo Bail Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Norton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. State v. Condran, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Young v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Blumenstetter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Ex Parte Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API