Legal Opinion
Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 23, 1991No. 1049-89PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
In this criminal bail bond forfeiture case, we granted Armadillo Bail Bonds’ petition for discretionary review, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 200(c)(4), in order to determine whether Article 22.-16(c)(2) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure violates the separation of powers provision of the Texas Constitution. See Tex. Const, art. 2, § 1. Having found the statute unconstitutional, we will affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Alejandro de Jesus Carreon, charged in Dallas County with a felony,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- In Re the Complaint Against Judge GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Schario v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Hill v. PirtleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.