Legal Opinion

Fur Funtastic, Ltd. v. Kearns

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 27, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered May 3, 1982 modified by granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the second cause of action and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to the appellant.

The facts are not in dispute. At issue is a bank check drawn by defendant Harlem Savings Bank on its account in a commercial bank. The check, in the amount of $1,000, was made payable to codefendant Kearns, the purchaser thereof, and indorsed over to plaintiff in satisfaction of services rendered to Kearns by plaintiff. Thereafter, the instrument was deposited by plaintiff and returned by the *795drawee…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meckler v. Highland Falls Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Manhattan Imported Cars, Inc. v. Dime Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. National Diamond Syndicate, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. First National Bank of Nocona v. Duncan Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Hospital of St. Raphael v. New Haven Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. First National Bank v. Duncan Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
  5. University Savings Ass'n v. Intercontinental Consolidated Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API