Legal Opinion

Meckler v. Highland Falls Savings & Loan Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton B. Silberman, J.

In an action on a check, plaintiff moves for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint (CPLR 3213).

The dispositive facts are not in dispute. Bernard Robins, who is not a party to this action, engaged plaintiff to design a home for him. Robins paid plaintiff $1,500 on account. On or about March 31, 1970 plaintiff requested Robins to pay him an additional $1,000. On that same day, Mrs. Robins went to defendant bank, wherein the Robins maintained a joint .savings account, and requested the bank to withdraw $1,000 from the savings account and to make a check payable in that amount to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Malphrus v. Home Savings Bank, New York County Courts1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moon Over the Mountain, Ltd. v. Marine Midland BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
  2. Da Silva v. SandersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Bank of New York v. WelzNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. First National Bank v. Duncan Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Fur Funtastic, Ltd. v. KearnsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API