A-1 Sandblasting & Steamcleaning Co. v. Baiden

This is an action on a liability insurance contract issued by defendants to plaintiff. Claims were made against plaintiff as a result of plaintiff’s spray paint operation. Defendants refused to pay the claims under the policy. As a result, plaintiff paid the claims and brought this action to recover the amounts paid. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment holding that exclusion (h) of the policy precluded coverage for the over-spray claims. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff was in the business of sandblasting, steamcleaning…