Legal Opinion

Kiddle v. Schnitzer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff, Clyde L. Kiddle, instituted this action against S. Schnitzer and others to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him as the result of a collision between an automobile operated by the plaintiff and a truck and trailer operated by and on behalf of the defendants. Prom a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the defendants the plaintiff appeals.

The accident occurred on November 6, 1938, about five-thirty o’clock in the evening, approximately six miles west of Pendleton on a part of IT. S. highway No. 30 commonly referred to as the Pendleton cut-off. This part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nordlund v. Lewis & Clark RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Barry v. TylerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Hornby v. WiperOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Murphy v. ReadOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dickson v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. DiCenzo v. IzawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Musulin v. Woodtek, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Evans v. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API