Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Otis Elevator Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 12, 2013No. Case No. 11-10200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 51)

PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s (“Otis”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiffs filed a response (ECF No. 67) and Otis filed a reply (ECF No. 89). The Court held a hearing on February 7, 2013. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Otis’s motion. INTRODUCTION

This action involves claims of age discrimination by six individuals, two of whom also assert claims of race discrimination, who were employed as mechanics by Defendant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woida v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Hamilton v. McDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
  3. Atanasovski v. Epic Equipment & Engineering, Inc. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  4. James E. Ritter v. Schindler Elevator Corp., et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  5. Katrina Lewis v. Magna Powertrain of America, Inc. d/b/a MPT Sterling HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API