Legal Opinion

Atanasovski v. Epic Equipment & Engineering, Inc. Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 5, 2021No. 2:19-cv-11518Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MIRKO ATANASOVSKI, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-11518 v. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge EPIC EQUIPMENT & ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant. _________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 19) On May 23, 2019, Plaintiff Mirko Atanasovski filed a Complaint against his former employer, Defendant Epic Equipment & Engineering, Inc., asserting four claims: (1) Count I – Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq.; (2)…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API