Legal Opinion

James E. Ritter v. Schindler Elevator Corp., et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 24, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00498Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES E. RITTER, ) CASE NO. 1:23-cv-00498 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE DAVID A. RUIZ ) v. ) ) SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP., et al., ) OPINION AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, James Ritter (“Ritter”), a twenty-three year employee of Defendant, Schindler Elevator Corporation (“SEC”), had his employment terminated on October 15, 2022, as part of a reduction in force (“RIF”). Ritter, who was age 53 at the time, (R. 1, PageID 6), sues his former employer under the Age in Employment Discrimination Act (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API