Legal Opinion

Work v. Bier

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 2, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-3500PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR L. BURNETT, Sr., United States Magistrate.

The progress of discovery in this patent case has been stymied by several motions raising complex issues of international law and international relations in the context of determining the scope and applicability of the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, done at the Hague on March 18, 1970, entered into force for the United States on October 7, 1972, 23 U.S.T. 2555, T.I.A.S. No. 7444, reprinted at 28 U.S.C.A. § 1781 note (West Supp.1985), referred to hereinafter as the Hague…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. British Aerospace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Honda American Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  2. McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  3. United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet Aircraft Displaying Tail Number VPCESDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Hudson v. Hermann Pfauter Gmbh & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1987
  5. Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API