United States v. First National City Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented on this appeal is of considerable importance to American banks with branches or offices in foreign jurisdictions. We are called upon to decide whether a domestic bank may refuse to comply with a valid Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of documents in the possession of a foreign branch of the bank on the ground that compliance would subject it to civil liability under the law of the foreign state.
The district judge’s factual recitation, carefully set forth upon the conclusion of the hearing on contempt, makes it unnecessary for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Holophane Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McMann v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. George G. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co., A.G. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., a Swiss Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. Finesilver, Etc., State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.