Legal Opinion

Holt v. Holt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1983No. 18692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

On October 7, 1981, plaintiff Joan Holt filed a complaint against defendant Douglas J. Holt for divorce. In the body of the complaint, plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that defendant should be ordered to pay the debts and obligations incurred during the marriage and that plaintiff should be held harmless therefrom. This allegation was also included as an item of the demand for relief in the complaint, although the “hold harmless” clause was not included. The complaint further contained an allegation to the effect that plaintiff “should not be awarded any alimony whatsoever.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Theodore W. Spong, Debtor. Raymond J. Pauley v. Theodore W. SpongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. Fife v. FifeUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Petoske v. Petoske (In Re Petoske)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  4. Diers v. Diers (In Re Diers)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. Columbia Valley Credit Exchange, Inc. v. LampsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hogie v. HogieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Martin v. MartinNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Beckmann v. BeckmannUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Holt v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API