Legal Opinion

Hogie v. Hogie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1995No. 18512PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

A former spouse appeals a circuit court order continuing his obligation to make certain payments under a decree of divorce despite his discharge in bankruptcy. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Bradley and Renata Hogie married in August 1979 and divorced in June 1992. They had one child. The decree, which incorporated the parties’ oral stipulation, made Bradley responsible for certain marital debts and required him to hold Renata harmless from those obligations. The decree also required Bradley to make periodic cash payments to Renata. The salient terms of the divorce decree…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re Clarence Oral Calhoun Fdba Bimbo's Place, Debtor. Jo Ann Long Fka Jo Ann Calhoun v. Clarence Oral Calhoun Fdba Bimbo's PlaceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,535 in Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates, Debtor. Paulette B. Yeates v. Brian Tibbetts YeatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. William J. Tilley, Jr., 7-85-0031 a v. Joyce JesseeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Ronald H. Boyle v. Catherine C. Boyle Donovan, Ronald H. Boyle, II and Robert E. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Driscoll v. DriscollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wolff v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brosnan v. BrosnanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Geraets v. GeraetsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API