Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1992No. 21798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the violation of an amended divorce decree (“decree”), wherein the appellant, James Scott Martin (“James”), agreed to indemnify the respondent, Judy Ann Martin (“Judy”), from personal liability for certain community debts. The district court ordered James to fulfill his obligations under the decree, despite his subsequent discharge in bankruptcy.

THE FACTS

James filed a complaint for divorce on July 30, 1986, after which Judy filed an answer and counterclaim. The decree, filed on August 2, 1988, provided, among other things, that James pay $320.00 in monthly child…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Clarence Oral Calhoun Fdba Bimbo's Place, Debtor. Jo Ann Long Fka Jo Ann Calhoun v. Clarence Oral Calhoun Fdba Bimbo's PlaceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Theodore W. Spong, Debtor. Raymond J. Pauley v. Theodore W. SpongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. In Re Edward Elijah Williams, Debtor. Joyce Colleen Williams v. Edward Elijah WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Huggins v. Huggins (In Re Huggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  5. Holt v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siragusa v. SiragusaNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Connor v. ConnorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API