Legal Opinion

Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1981No. 1271PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Civil Division, in which the lower court granted defendant’s Preliminary Objections dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages an|d also dismissed the individual plaintiff, Daniel Adams, from the case.

A demurrer to a complaint admits all well pleaded facts and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. In order to sustain a demurrer it must be certain that the law will not permit recovery upon the facts pleaded, all of which are to be taken as true. Tannenbaum v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 265…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Iron Mountain Security Storage Corp. v. American Specialty Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Tanenbaum v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Standard Pipeline Coating Co. v. Solomon & Teslovich, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kinnel, Eugene F. v. Mid-Atlantic Mausoleums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates v. PassenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hineline v. Stroudsburg Electric Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API