Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1979No. 308PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This case is before us following the lower court’s dismissal of appellants’ complaint in assumpsit and entry of judgment on the pleadings in favor of appellees. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

A demurrer admits every well pleaded material fact set forth in the pleadings, as well as all inferences, other than conclusions of law, reasonably deducible therefrom. Gekas v. Shapp, 469 Pa. 1, 364 A.2d 691 (1976); Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings and Loan Association, 457 Pa. 135, 320 A.2d 117 (1974); Bordon v. Baldwin, 444 Pa. 577, 281…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Berger v. AckermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hineline v. Stroudsburg Electric Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Telstar Corp. v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API