Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates v. Passen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1984No. 2543PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to a counterclaim. The counterclaim was filed by a tenant in response to her landlord’s action for accelerated rent which became due when the tenant vacated the apartment prematurely.

Gloria Passen was tenant and Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates, a limited partnership, was lessor under the terms of a written apartment lease having a term of two years. The tenant discontinued the payment of rent when she vacated the apartment at the end of the first year. The lessor thereupon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Martin v. Little, Brown and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Fair v. NegleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Emerman v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Kinnel, Eugene F. v. Mid-Atlantic Mausoleums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Jordan v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Rodgers v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Walkup v. Santander Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API