Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates v. Passen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIEAND, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to a counterclaim. The counterclaim was filed by a tenant in response to her landlord’s action for accelerated rent which became due when the tenant vacated the apartment prematurely.
Gloria Passen was tenant and Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates, a limited partnership, was lessor under the terms of a written apartment lease having a term of two years. The tenant discontinued the payment of rent when she vacated the apartment at the end of the first year. The lessor thereupon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Martin v. Little, Brown and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fair v. NegleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Emerman v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Kinnel, Eugene F. v. Mid-Atlantic Mausoleums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Jordan v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Rodgers v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Walkup v. Santander Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.