Legal Opinion

Standard Pipeline Coating Co. v. Solomon & Teslovich, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1985No. 865 and 901PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

These cross-appeals arise from actions by the lower court, which denied a motion for a partial new trial by the verdict winner, and a motion for a new trial and/or a judgment n.o.v. by the party against whom the verdict was issued. On appeal, the verdict winner asserts that the lower court erred in: (1) disallowing a claim based upon previously unrecognized tort grounds; (2) denying a claim for punitive damages; and (3) refusing to mold the verdict to provide pre-judgment interest on the consequential damages awarded by the jury. On its appeal, the verdict loser contends…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Parkway Garage Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Northview Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation Joseph P. Nigro, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API