Legal Opinion
In re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 21, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-60-JJFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, William Seidel and Ronald Gold-stein filed these consolidated class actions in February 1992 on behalf of a class consisting of more than 33,000 purchasers of limited partnership interests in the ML-LEE Acquisition Fund II, L.P. (“Fund II”) and ML-LEE Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. (“Retirement Fund II”) (together “the Funds”). The Consolidated Amended Complaint alleges that defendants1 violated federal securities laws and common law in connection with the sale of limited partnership interests in the Funds.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Wiley v. Hughes Capital Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Rode v. Emery Air Freight Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fechter v. HMW IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- GAMCO Investors, Inc. v. Vivendi, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re Grand Casinos, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Burstein v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Roseman v. Sports & RecreationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.