Rode v. Emery Air Freight Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
FACTS
This case is an alleged class action instituted by the representative plaintiff, who contends that she was refused employment by defendant as a salesperson at defendant’s Greater Pittsburgh Airport facility because of her sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. *230§ 2000e et seq. Plaintiff purports to represent a nationwide class of females categorized in the complaint as follows:(1) female persons who are now employed, have been employed from July 2, 1965 to the present, or might be employed by the defendant, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barry Escott and Others v. Barchris Construction Corporation, and Others, Defendants-Respondents, Georgehall, and Others, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- James W. Sanderson v. The Honorable Fred M. Winner, United States District Judge for the District OfcoloradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- P.D.Q. Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bartelson v. Dean Witter & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kamens v. Horizon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Folding Cartons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Klein v. Henry S. Miller Residential Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.