Legal Opinion

Board of Transportation v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1977No. 7628SC1019PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendants assign as error the exclusion by the trial court of evidence of traffic noise from the controlled-access highway to be constructed on part of their land taken by the petitioner, causing a diminution in value of their remaining land.

This issue was properly raised by the defendants. The record on appeal reveals that defendant Neil E. Brown testified, in pertinent part, and the court ruled, as follows:

“[A]nd there’s going to be noise, there’s going to be damage —

Mr. SALLEY: Objection; motion to strike.

The COURT: Objection sustáined. Motion to strike allowed. Don’t…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Carolina & Yadkin River Railroad v. ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. STATE, BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Department of Transportation v. BraggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Board of Transportation v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CarrollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API