Legal Opinion

Board of Transportation v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1982No. 8118SC1200PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The first question for determination is whether the trial court erred in concluding that the Lauder right-of-way agreement did not reserve for defendants any right of direct access to the ramps leading to 1-40 and reserved only abutters’ rights of access to Pinecroft Road.

A right-of-way agreement similar to the Lauder right-of-way agreement was dealt with by the Supreme Court in Abdalla v. Highway Commission, 261 N.C. 114, 134 S.E. 2d 81 (1964). The Ab-dalla agreement provided that the grantors “and heirs and assigns shall have no right of access to the highway constructed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Olive v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Smith v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Williams v. SappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTHORITY v. CostaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API