Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1953No. Appeal, No. 16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Tbe order of tbe Commission of October 5, 1953, is affirmed. Tbe opinion of this Court will be filed at a subsequent date.

Tbe order issued by this Court on October 15, 1953, making tbe appeal, No. 16, April Term, 1954, a super-sedeas of tbe Commission’s order, is vacated, and super-sedeas is terminated.

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an appeal by tbe City of Pittsburgh from an order of tbe Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of October 5, 1953, allowing rate increases, including basic street car fare from 17 cents to 20 cents, by Pittsburgh Railways Company.

Tbe City questions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Greyhound Corp., SE Greyhound Lines Div. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Citizens Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Merz White Way Tours v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API