Legal Opinion

Nanney v. Linella, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1997No. 22554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Ellis Nanney filed an action against Linella Inc., d.b.a. Grant Petersen Buick-Pontiae-GMC (hereinafter referred to as “Petersen” or “the dealership”) to recover damages after Petersen repossessed a truck Nanney had purchased. On Nanney’s motion the district court granted summary judgment against Petersen on the issue of liability. A jury trial was conducted to determine the amount of damages, and judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict. Petersen now appeals, arguing that summary judgment on liability ought not have been granted because there existed genuine factual issues…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sanders v. Kuna Joint School DistrictIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. LothropIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Driver v. SI CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API