Gunnip v. Lautenklos

Bramhall, Vice Chancellor:

The dispute in this case arises out of the submission by Healy, one of four bidders responding to the proposal of the Commission, of a letter in which four items were suggested as substitutes for items listed in the formal bid made by Healy. Three of the items suggested were not covered by the specifications. The fourth item, in which Healy suggested the *418use of another type of window as a substitute for the typé listed in his formal bid, was within the specifications of the architect. The windows suggested by Healy as a substitute were the same windows listed by…