Legal Opinion

Weinacht v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of County of Bergen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 19, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wachenfeld. J.

Does R. 8. 40:9-3 require bids for structural steel and ornamental iron work singly or in combination? The Superior Court determined separate bids were provided for, while the Appellate Division held the import of the statute was “to combine steel and iron in a single bid.” Certification having been allowed, the question so posed is before us for determination.

In November, 1948, the Bergen County Board of Freeholders advertised for competitive bids for the construction of a hospital building. Among other things, the advertisement called…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Matter of On-Line Games ContractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Armaniaco v. CresskillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API