Legal Opinion
Gunnip v. Lautenklos
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided February 9, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 A.2d 712 (1953)
GUNNIP et al.
v.
LAUTENKLOS et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
February 9, 1953.
Stewart Lynch and Alfred R. Fraczkowski, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.
Joseph A. L. Errigo and John M. Bader, Wilmington, for School Building Commission.
S. Samuel Arsht and John T. Gallagher (of Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht), Wilmington, for Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
The dispute in this case arises out of the submission by Healy, one of four bidders responding to the proposal of the Commission, of a letter in which four items were suggested as substitutes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Carbone, Inc. v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kavanaugh v. City of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Weinacht v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Ebbeson v. Board of Public EducationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kreshtool v. Delmarva Power and Light Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Spear v. Blackwell & Son, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1966
- Kaiser v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959