Legal Opinion

Kouri v. Toma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1947No. 32492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced to recover the balance due on a promissory note in the principal sum of $1,321.54, said note being executed by the defendant, Y. M. Kouri, payable to the plaintiff, Joseph E. Toma. The note was executed at Hobart, Okla., on January 30, 1941. On the 14th day of April, 1942, a judgment was taken for the installments due at the rate of $25 per month, the amount of said judgment being $175. In the answer in, the case at bar the position of defendant was that the judgment in the justice of peace court cancelled the remaining amount due on the said note. The note provided…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. First National Bank v. SchrubenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Puckett v. National Annuity Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Jensen v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Kiamichi Electric Cooperative v. UnderwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. LSB Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Zalobowski v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Zalobowski v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API