Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Isinghood

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2003No. 30695PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARCHER, Chief Justice:

In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock County, we are asked to review a circuit court’s dismissal of an amended complaint, on the ground that the amended complaint was filed after the expiration of the statute of limitation. After consideration of the arguments of the parties, we conclude that under Rule 15 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, the amended complaint “relates back” to the date the original complaint was filed — a date within the limitation period — and thereby avoids the effects of the statute of limitation.

As set forth below, we…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. James T. Donald v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Clifford K. v. Paul S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Noland v. Virginia Insurance ReciprocalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API