United States v. Clarke
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a plea of guilty to the offense of violating a general regulation is to be held improvident because the trial judge did not explain in particular detail to the accused the provisions of the regulation violated. There is also a question as to the maximum punishment.
I
The first issue comes about by virtue of the provisions of Fort Campbell Regulation 190-5 as follows:
2. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA. It shall be unlawful and a criminal offense for any person to possess, have under his control, or deliver any device,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HughesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. CrouchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. WallerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SheehanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. BradleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. FriedmanU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. DeSotoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. DeSotoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982