United States v. David "Tex" Hill
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
The question before us is whether, and to what extent, the aiding and abetting clause of 18 U.S.C. § 2 1 applies to the “illegal gambling business” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1955, a complex crime that in addition to illegality under state law as a predicate offense has requirements of size (five or more people), duration (30 days or more), and business activity (“whoever conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs or owns”) 2 . Find ing persuasive a Second Circuit case holding that § 2 does not apply to a similar drug enterprise statute (discussed below), the district…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Vincent WebberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Parnell Harold BouchaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Victor Ramirez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.