Legal Opinion

United States v. David "Tex" Hill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1995No. 94-5183PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Chief Judge.

The question before us is whether, and to what extent, the aiding and abetting clause of 18 U.S.C. § 2 1 applies to the “illegal gambling business” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1955, a complex crime that in addition to illegality under state law as a predicate offense has requirements of size (five or more people), duration (30 days or more), and business activity (“whoever conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs or owns”) 2 . Find ing persuasive a Second Circuit case holding that § 2 does not apply to a similar drug enterprise statute (discussed below), the district…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Vincent WebberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Parnell Harold BouchaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Victor Ramirez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API