Legal Opinion
Bostic v. McClendon
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided July 10, 1986No. C85-2330APublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
HORACE T. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants violated several of their constitutionally protected rights. The matter is now before the court on motions by the plaintiffs and defendants for summary judgment. Also before the court is defendants’ motion for leave to file a supplemental statement of undisputed material facts. Being unopposed, defendants’ motion for leave to file a supplemental statement of undisputed material facts is GRANTED. After careful consideration of the briefs and exhibits filed in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 79 v. Rick ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Taylor v. O'GRADYDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- University of Colorado Ex Rel. University of Colorado v. DerdeynSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.