Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1943No. 11543PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEITH, Chief Justice.

This is the third appeal in a Rule 37 case. The action was originally brought by appellant, Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, to set aside a permit issued to ap-pellee, Midas Oil Company, by the Railroad Commission of Texas, to drill a second well on a 2.14 acre tract of land in the East Texas Oil field in Gregg County and to permanently, enjoin appel-lee from producing oil from the well authorized by the permit.

In the first appeal from a judgment for appellee (reported in volume 123 S.W.2d 911, writ dismissed) the Austin Court of Civil Appeals set aside the permit involved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. McLemore v. BickerstaffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Hill v. EngelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. T. E. Mercer Trucking Co. (In Re T. E. Mercer Trucking Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. TrappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API