Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1940No. 9016; Motion No. 9444PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

This is a Rule 37 case on second appeal to this court. The first appeal is reported in 123 S.W.2d 911, writ dismissed. On the former appeal we set aside as invalid the permit involved and reversed and remanded the case with instructions. On the motion for rehearing, however, and because the trial court had rendered judgment against plaintiff, appellant therein, at the close of its evidence, and without any evidence having been offered on the part of the defendants, we reversed and remanded the case for another trial. Upon the second trial hereof, the trial court, upon motion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  2. Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. TrappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Pickens v. Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc. v. Missouri-Pacific Freight Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API