Legal Opinion
Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 25, 1938No. 8635PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUGH, Justice.
■ This is a rule 37 case. Appeal is from a judgment of the District Court, based upon an instructed verdict, sustaining the validity of a permit granted to the Midas Oil Company to drill a second well on 2.14 acres of land in the East Texas oil field in Gregg County, being a strip about 1200 feet long and about 70 feet wide. In January, 1935, the Midas Oil Company, which then had one producing well on said strip located approximately 500 feet from the east end thereof, applied to the Commission for permits for two additional wells thereon. After hearing the Commission refused…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Sun Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Atlantic Oil Production Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Railroad Commission v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- State v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. TrappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.