Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Trapp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1946No. 9535PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

This is a Rule 37 case. Suit was by the Humble to cancel a permit granted by the Railroad Commission to G. T. Blankenship to drill a second well on a 2.08-acre tract of land located in the west edge of the fairway of the East Texas oil field in Gregg County; and to enjoin production from said well which had been drilled thereunder. The permit, dated February 28, 1941, was granted by Commissioners Thompson and Sadler, Culberson dissenting, on the recited grounds to prevent confiscation and waste. Trapp was made a party to the suit as owner of a half interest in the lease. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Edgar v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hawkins v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Traylor v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Big Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. WYOMING OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSIONWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kelly v. HeimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API