Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of McCombs

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1917No. L. A. No. 4857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County distributing the estate of a deceased person. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Appellant, Helen McCombs Fairchild, opposed distribution of the estate of Helen McCombs, deceased, upon the theory that said appellant was the adopted daiighter of Helen McCombs and a pretermitted heir. The court found that contestant was not the legally adopted daughter of Helen McCombs, and that the omission to provide for Mrs. Fairchild in decedent’s will was intentional. She and her assignee, J. B. Irsfeld, have appealed from the decree distributing the estate in accordance with the provisions of the will of Helen McCombs.

The contestant introduced evidence tending to show that while she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Tyler v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Estate of McKeagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ex parte ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ex parte ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Davey v. Los Angeles County Bureau of AdoptionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Estate of TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Multhaup v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Borner v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API