Legal Opinion

Estate of Taggart

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1923No. L. A. No. 7310PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

Petitioner, Edna Taggart Boland, sought to have distributed to her by the probate court of Los Angeles County the whole of decedent’s estate, inventoried at the sum of $45,426, under the provisions of section 1307 of the Civil Code, claiming said estate as an adopted daughter and only heir at law of Francis S. Taggart, deceased, who unintentionally omitted her in his will. The court decided adversely to petitioner and its decision is here for review.

The court’s findings are that Francis S. Taggart died on the third day of December, 1919, leaving a will, which was duly admitted to probate.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In re the Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cubley v. BarbeeTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Estate of MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Appeal of RitchieNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Morris v. TrotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API