Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1986No. 81 Civ. 1836(MP)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS AND OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge:
THE ACTION
This is a civil insider trading liability action, brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), authorized by Section 21(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d), seeking an injunction and other ancillary relief, including disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, against defendants based on defendants’ violations of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws and regulations. Subject-matter jurisdiction is posited on Sections 21(e) and 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(e)…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Danny O. Cherif, and Khaled Sanchou, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WaterhouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Naylor Clark, Iii, and Russell G. Van MoppesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HashoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.