Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hasho
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1992No. 90 Civ. 7953PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
On December 13,1990, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed its complaint in this action alleging that defendants, ten registered representatives, engaged in unlawful high pressure sales of small highly speculative stocks, sometimes referred to in Wall Street parlance as “dogs,” to unwary customers and caused trades to be entered in customer accounts without customer authorization. The SEC alleges that by such conduct, defendants violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a) (the “Securities Act”), and…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Geman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Boettcher & Co., Inc. v. MunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.