Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Danny O. Cherif, and Khaled Sanchou, Nominal
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 7, 1991No. 90-1688, 90-1805PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought this civil enforcement action against defendant Danny 0. Cherif, alleging that Cherif had violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, in particular Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78n(e) (1988), and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder. 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.1Ob-5 and 240.14e-3 (1990). Section 21 of the Exchange Act allows the court to enjoin further violations of the securities laws upon a showing that defen dant did in fact violate the laws or…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Robert ChestmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.