Legal Opinion
JOE HUDSON COLLISION CENTER v. Dymond
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 30, 2009No. 1060809 and 1060856PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Justice.
These two appeals are from the denial of two motions to compel the arbitration of claims asserted in a single complaint in the Montgomery Circuit Court. The appeals have been consolidated for the purpose of writing one opinion.
Background
Blake Dymond was hired by Joe Hudson Collision Center (“JHCC”) as a painter’s helper, and within days he was moved to the position of painter. He participated with two other painters in a plan under which each painter would receive one-third pay for all hours worked by the three painters, but when Dymond returned irom a two-day leave, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eric Anderton and Jackson Key Practice Solutions, LLC v. The Practice-Monroeville, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Federal Insurance Co. v. ReedstromSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ChapmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Rainbow Cinemas, LLC v. Consol. Constr. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Eric Anderton and Jackson Key Practice Solutions, LLC v. The Practice-Monroeville, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.