Legal Opinion

Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTS

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 2003No. 1021166PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Polaris Sales, Inc., appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of a dispute with Heritage Imports, Inc.1 We reverse and remand.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Polaris is a Minnesota corporation engaged in the sale and distribution of recreational vehicles, including personal watercraft and all-terrain vehicles, to independent dealers who are authorized to sell "Polaris products"2 to retail customers. Heritage, which is located in Fairhope, Alabama, is engaged in the business of selling recreational vehicles to retail customers.

Heritage and Polaris entered into an agreement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Professional Ins. Corp. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Smith v. Mark Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Title Max of Birmingham, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Hereford v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API