Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance Co. v. Reedstrom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 2015No. 1141153PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

Federal Insurance Company appeals the order of the Márshall Circuit Court denying its motion to compel arbitration of the breach-of-contract claim asserted against it by Kert Reedstrom. We reverse and remand.

I

In 2008, Reedstrom entered into a written employment agreement with Marshall-Jackson Mental Health Board, Inc., d/b/a Mountain Lakes Behavioral Healthcare (“MLBHC”), to begin serving as its executive director in Gúntersville. During the course of Reedstrom’s employment with MLBHC, MLBHC held an executive-liability, entity-liability, and employment-prac*973tices-liability…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Managed Health Care Admin., Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Bugs "R" Us, LLC v. McCantsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. Regions Bank v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Eickhoff Corp. v. Warrior Met Coal, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Rainbow Cinemas, LLC v. Consol. Constr. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API