Legal Opinion
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Osterberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 5, 1937No. 31,358PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or a new trial in replevin for an automobile. The facts were stipulated.
May 22, 1935, plaintiff’s assignor, McNeal Motor Sales Company, sold on conditional sale contract an automobile to one Emanuelson. A down payment left a balance of $650 payable in monthly instalments, the buyer giving his promissory note therefor. Both note and contract were assigned to plaintiff. January 2, 1936, the buyer being in default on several instalments, plaintiff commenced action for their recovery and twice garnished his wages.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Frisch v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Ratchford v. Cayuga County Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Minneapolis Harvester Works v. HallySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. HandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Marquette Appliances, Inc. v. Economy Food Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- National Cash Register Co. v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Minnesota State Bank of St. Paul v. BatcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Soter v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.